<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pay U2 Blog Advertising &#187; New York Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.payu2blog.com/get-paid-to-blog/new-york-times/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.payu2blog.com</link>
	<description>Get Paid to Blog! Blog Advertising</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:25:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More attempts to Dis Paid Blogging This time by the NY Times?</title>
		<link>http://blog.payu2blog.com/more-attempts-to-dis-paid-blogging-this-time-by-the-ny-times.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.payu2blog.com/more-attempts-to-dis-paid-blogging-this-time-by-the-ny-times.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payu2blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.payu2blog.com/367/more-attempts-to-dis-paid-blogging-this-time-by-the-ny-times/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A friend sent me this article with the title blogging bad in the subject&#8230; As I read through the article I realized he could be onto something&#8230; with all the negative backlash about paid blogging and people trying (ridiculously) to make it some sort of moral issue, Could this article in the NY Times be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend sent me this article with the title blogging bad in the subject&#8230; As I read through the article I realized he could be onto something&#8230; with all the negative backlash about paid blogging and people trying (ridiculously)  to make it some sort of moral issue,  Could  this article in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/06/technology/06sweat.html?ex=1365134400&amp;en=31ff8262bb73cea2&amp;ei=5124&amp;partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink" title="Blogging Will Kill you  LOL LOL">NY Times</a>  be just another sneaky way for some big media companies (you pick one) to discourage the little guy (paid bloggers) from disrupting their &#8220;cash flow Cow&#8221; of  advertising fees?</p>
<p>Some may laugh but it could be&#8230; <img src='http://blog.payu2blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Here is an excerpt :</p>
<p>&#8220;To be sure, there is no official diagnosis of death by blogging, and the premature demise of two people obviously does not qualify as an epidemic.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow!  There is sure nothing like talk of death to scare people away&#8230; I guess   it&#8217;s not only immoral for you to make money on your own- with your own blog- but now you risk death accd. to the article&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe they were trying to do some good here but I can&#8217;t help but think the whole article is completely  absurd and/  or it really is some sort of anti paid blogging agenda PR piece.  What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.payu2blog.com/more-attempts-to-dis-paid-blogging-this-time-by-the-ny-times.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

